About the Author
Robert N. Stavins is the Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government, Director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, and Chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Faculty Group.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Kennedy School of Government, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. This blog is based in part on columns published by The Environmental Forum, published by the Environmental Law Institute.Important Links:
Email Updates
Categories
- Climate Change Policy
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Economic Policy
- Economic Stimulus Policy
- Energy Economics
- Energy Policy
- Environmental Economics
- Environmental Policy
- Fisheries Policy
- Forest Policy
- Health Policy
- Natural Resource Economics
- Natural Resource Policy
- Politics
- Positive Political Economy
- Water Policy
- Wine Economics
Other Blogs:
- Dot Earth
- Economics Unbound
- Economist’s View
- Economix
- Environmental Economics
- Financial Times Blogs
- Grasping Reality with Both Hands (Brad DeLong)
- Greed, Green and Grains
- Green Inc.
- Greg Mankiw’s Blog
- Jeff Frankel’s Weblog
- Law & The Environment
- National Journal Online: Energy & Environment
- regulation2point0
- RGE Monitor
- The Business Desk
- The Energy Collective
- The Huffington Post
- Urbanomics
- Vox
Archives
Tag Archives: common but differentiated responsibilities
The Platform Opens a Window: An Unambiguous Consequence of the Durban Climate Talks
In my previous essay – following the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP-17) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which adjourned on December 11, 2011 – I offered my assessment of the Durban climate negotiations, addressing … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Energy Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy, Natural Resource Policy, Politics, Positive Political Economy
Tagged Brazil, Cancun Agreements, China, common but differentiated responsibilities, COP-15, COP-16, COP-17, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Accord, cost-effectiveness, distributional equity, Durban, Durban Platform, environmental politics, global climate policy, India, Kyoto Protocol, Mexico, Obama Administration, South Africa
8 Comments
What Hath Copenhagen Wrought? A Preliminary Assessment of the Copenhagen Accord
After years of preparation, the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties (COP-15) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) commenced on December 7th, 2009, and adjourned some two weeks later on December 19th after a raucous all-night session. … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Energy Economics, Energy Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy, Forest Policy, Positive Political Economy
Tagged Annex I, Asia-Pacific Economic Conference, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Brazilian President da Silva, cap-and-trade, China, common but differentiated responsibilities, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Accord, cost-effectiveness, Cuba, distributional equity, environmental politics, European Union, finance, forestry, free rider problem, global climate policy, import allowance requirement, India, Indian Prime Minister Singh, Japan, Korea, Major Economies Forum, market-based environmental policies, Mexico, Nicaragua, Obama Administration, Portfolio Approach, Premier Wen Jiabo, South Africa, South African President Zuma, Sudan, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, UNFCCC, Venezuela, Waxman-Markey legislation
36 Comments
Approaching Copenhagen with a Portfolio of Domestic Commitments
As we approach the beginning of the Fifteenth Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen in December, international negotiations are focused on developing a climate policy framework for the post-2012 period, … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Energy Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy, Positive Political Economy
Tagged and verification (MRV), Annex I, Australia, Bali Action Plan, cap-and-trade, China, climate accession deals, common but differentiated responsibilities, Copenhagen, cost-effectiveness, distributional equity, environmental politics, Europe, European Union, executive agreement, G8(+5), global climate policy, Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, India, Japan, linkage of cap-and-trade systems, Major Economies Forum, market-based environmental policies, measurement, Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), Obama Administration, regulation, reporting, revenue-neutral taxes, treaty law, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, UNFCCC, Waxman-Markey legislation
9 Comments
