About the Author
Robert N. Stavins is the Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government, Director of the Harvard Environmental Economics Program, and Chairman of the Environment and Natural Resources Faculty Group.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Kennedy School of Government, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. This blog is based in part on columns published by The Environmental Forum, published by the Environmental Law Institute.Important Links:
Email Updates
Categories
- Climate Change Policy
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Economic Policy
- Economic Stimulus Policy
- Energy Economics
- Energy Policy
- Environmental Economics
- Environmental Policy
- Fisheries Policy
- Forest Policy
- Health Policy
- Natural Resource Economics
- Natural Resource Policy
- Politics
- Positive Political Economy
- Water Policy
- Wine Economics
Other Blogs:
- Dot Earth
- Economics Unbound
- Economist’s View
- Economix
- Environmental Economics
- Financial Times Blogs
- Grasping Reality with Both Hands (Brad DeLong)
- Greed, Green and Grains
- Green Inc.
- Greg Mankiw’s Blog
- Jeff Frankel’s Weblog
- Law & The Environment
- National Journal Online: Energy & Environment
- regulation2point0
- RGE Monitor
- The Business Desk
- The Energy Collective
- The Huffington Post
- Urbanomics
- Vox
Archives
Tag Archives: Canada
Canada’s Step Away From the Kyoto Protocol Can Be a Constructive Step Forward
Canada confirmed this week that it will not take on a target under an extension of the Kyoto Protocol following the completion of the first commitment period, 2008-2012. Given that Canada is likely to miss by a wide margin its … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Energy Economics, Energy Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy, Positive Political Economy
Tagged Annex I, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Cancun, China, COP-15, COP-16, COP-17, Copenhagen Accord, distributional equity, Durban, environmental politics, European Union, free rider problem, global climate policy, India, Japan, Korea, Kyoto Protocol, Mexico, New Zealand, Obama Administration, Russia, South Africa
5 Comments
Cap-and-Trade versus the Alternatives for U.S. Climate Policy
Let’s credit Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) for raising questions in the National Journal about the viability of cap-and-trade versus other approaches for the United States to employ in addressing CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions linked with global climate change. Senator … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Energy Economics, Energy Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy
Tagged Australia, CAFE standards, Canada, cap-and-trade, carbon tax, cost-effectiveness, distributional analysis, distributional equity, efficiency, endangerment finding, environmental politics, European Union, global climate policy, Hamilton Project, Japan, leaded gasoline, market-based environmental policies, National Journal, New Source Review, New Zealand, Obama Administration, ozone depleting substances, RECLAIM program, regulation, sulfur dioxide, Supreme Court, technology innovation, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, vintage differentiated regulation, Waxman-Markey legislation
20 Comments
Three Pillars of a New Climate Pact
THE climate change summit at the United Nations on Tuesday, September 22nd, is aimed to build momentum for the 15th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen in December, where nations will continue … Continue reading
Posted in Climate Change Policy, Environmental Economics, Environmental Policy
Tagged Australia, Canada, cap-and-trade, carbon leakage, China, climate agreements, COP-15, cost-effectiveness, distributional equity, European Union, externalities, free rider problem, G20, global climate policy, growth targets, international climate policy architecture, Japan, Kyoto Protocol, linkage of cap-and-trade systems, market-based environmental policies, New Zealand, Obama Administration, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, United Nations, Waxman-Markey legislation
6 Comments
